Why I Keep Returning to Naive Drawing
I return to naive drawing again and again because it allows me to stay close to feeling without translating it into performance. Naive drawing does not ask for permission from technique. It begins from impulse, from response, from the need to put something down before it disappears. In my work, this quality matters more than refinement. It keeps the drawing alive rather than correct.

Naivety as a Conscious Choice
Naive drawing is often misunderstood as a lack of ability, but for me it is a deliberate position. Choosing not to smooth, perfect, or over-control a line is a way of protecting emotional truth. When the hand hesitates, repeats itself, or presses too hard, that hesitation becomes part of the meaning. Naivety here is not ignorance. It is trust in instinct over polish.
Emotional Honesty Versus Visual Control
Technical skill offers control, but control can distance emotion. When a drawing becomes too resolved, it can begin to speak more about competence than experience. Emotional honesty behaves differently. It allows awkwardness, imbalance, and excess to remain visible. In my drawings, these qualities are not flaws. They are evidence that something real has passed through the image.

Why the Body Reads Naive Drawings Differently
There is a bodily response to naive drawing that bypasses analysis. Uneven lines, disproportioned figures, and simplified forms are processed as gestures rather than representations. The nervous system recognises the immediacy. It feels closer to handwriting than illustration. This is why naive drawings often feel intimate. They don’t perform distance.
Historical Roots of Naive Expression
Naive drawing has long existed outside academic frameworks. Folk art, outsider art, children’s drawings, and ritual markings all prioritised meaning and presence over correctness. These traditions valued expression as communication rather than display. I feel connected to this lineage, where drawing functions as record, protection, or emotional release rather than proof of mastery.

Naive Forms as Emotional Containers
Simple shapes and direct figures act as containers for feeling. When form is stripped of complexity, emotion has more space to resonate. A face drawn with minimal detail can carry more intensity than a realistic one because it leaves room for projection. In my work, naive forms allow emotion to sit without being over-defined.
Imperfection as a Site of Truth
Imperfection is where honesty enters. A crooked symmetry, an unbalanced composition, a repeated correction all reveal decision-making in real time. These marks show doubt, insistence, and return. I am interested in these moments because they mirror emotional processes. Feeling is rarely efficient. It circles, revisits, and adjusts.

The Risk of Hiding Behind Skill
Skill can become a shield. It can protect the artist from vulnerability by offering something impressive instead. Naive drawing removes that shield. It exposes intention without armour. This exposure is uncomfortable, but it is also what allows the drawing to communicate without distance. The image does not impress. It confesses.
Why Naive Drawings Feel Accessible
People often respond to naive drawings with recognition rather than admiration. They feel approachable because they don’t demand expertise to be understood. The viewer does not feel tested. Instead, they are invited into a shared emotional space. This accessibility does not make the work simple. It makes it open.

Emotional Accuracy Over Aesthetic Perfection
I am more interested in emotional accuracy than aesthetic perfection. A drawing that captures the weight, tension, or fragility of a moment matters more to me than one that demonstrates control. Naive drawing prioritises this accuracy by staying close to sensation. It does not refine emotion into something acceptable. It keeps it raw enough to remain true.
Why Naive Drawing Still Matters
In a culture saturated with polished images and technical display, naive drawing offers an alternative rhythm. It slows things down. It re-centres attention on experience rather than execution. For me, it remains one of the most honest visual languages available. It allows drawing to return to its original function: to say something that cannot wait to be perfected.